Skip to main content

Stack with find minimum function

Question : Implement a stack which finds the minimum of elements in the stack. All the three functions push(), pop() and findmin() must have time complexity of O(1)

This is one of the common questions asked in interviews.

The problem is finding minimum requires you to traverse through the stack, which is not possible without popping elements. So you can pop elements, find minimum and then push the elements back.

But the requirement says that findmin() function must have a constant complexity - O(1).

You can achieve this with the help of one more stack, to store minimum values.

Let us call this minstack. This is how the operations will work

push - 

  • push a value to stack
  • compare the value with top of minstack
    • if value is smaller than minstack top element push it to minstack
    • if not push minstack top element again to minstack

pop 

  • pop a value from stack
  • pop a value from minstack

findmin

  • get the value from minstack without popping it (peek)
 So this way we can have all three functions with O(1) time complexity. Here is our code


#include<stdio.h>  
#include<stdlib.h>
#define ERROR -1000
 struct node  
 {  
   int value;  
   struct node *next;   
 };  
 typedef struct node * NODEPTR;  
 
 NODEPTR create_node(int value)  
 {  
   NODEPTR temp = (NODEPTR) malloc(sizeof(struct node));  
    temp->next = NULL;  
   temp->value= value;  
   return temp;  
 } 
 NODEPTR push(NODEPTR top,int val)
 { 
     NODEPTR newnode = create_node(val);
     newnode->next = top;
     top = newnode;
     return top;
}
int isempty(NODEPTR top)
{
   return top==NULL;
}
int pop(NODEPTR *topPtr)
{
   if(isempty(*topPtr))
       return ERROR;
   int num = (*topPtr)->value;
   NODEPTR temp = *topPtr;
   *topPtr = (*topPtr)->next;
   free(temp);
   return num;
}
int peek(NODEPTR nd)
{
   return nd->value;
 }

void push1(NODEPTR*topptr,NODEPTR* mintopptr,int val)
{
     int minval =val;
     if(*mintopptr!=NULL)
        {
    int temp = peek(*mintopptr);
           if (temp<minval)
               minval = temp;
        }
     *topptr = push(*topptr,val);
     *mintopptr = push(*mintopptr,minval);
 }

 int pop1(NODEPTR* topptr,NODEPTR *mintopptr)
 {
   if(!isempty(*topptr))
   {
    pop(mintopptr);
    return pop(topptr);
   }else
       return -1;
 }
      
int findmin(NODEPTR mintop)
{
   if(mintop==NULL)
      return -1;
   return mintop->value;
}   

 int main()  
 {  
     NODEPTR top = NULL;//stack
     NODEPTR nd;
     NODEPTR mintop=NULL;//minstack

     while(1)
     {  
       int option,value; 
       printf("Enter 1- push 2- pop 3 - exit 4- find minimum"); 
       scanf("%d",&option);
       if(option==3)
          break;
       switch(option)
       {
           case 1:  printf("new value to push=");  
             scanf("%d",&value);   
                    push1(&top,&mintop,value);
                    break;
           case 2:  value = pop1(&top,&mintop);
                    if(value==ERROR)
                         printf("Stack empty\n");
                    else
    printf("Value popped is %d\n",value);
                    break; 
           case 4:  value=findmin(mintop);
                    if(value==-1)
                        printf("Stack empty\n");
                    else
                    printf("Minimum of stack is %d\n",value);
             
                    break;
        }  
    }     
 }  

Notes
  1. We are implementing the stack using a linked list
  2. push1() function is used for pushing the value to both the stack and minstack. pop1 is used for popping values.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In order traversal of nodes in the range x to y

Question : Write a function for in-order traversal of nodes in the range x to y from a binary search tree. This is quite a simple function. As a first solution we can just traverse our binary search tree in inorder and display only the nodes which are in the range x to y. But if the current node has a value less than x, do we have to traverse its left subtree? No. Because all the nodes in left subtree will be smaller than x. Similarly if the current node has a key value more than y, we need not visit its right subtree. Now we are ready to write our algorithm.     if nd is NOT NULL  if nd->val >=x then visit all the nodes of left subtree of nd recursively display nd->val if nd->val <y then visit all the nodes of right subtree of nd recursively  That's all. We have our function ready. void in_order_middle (NODEPTR nd, int x, int y) { if (nd) { if (nd -> val >= x) in_order_middle(nd...

Josephus problem

Question: Write a function to delete every k th node from circular linked list until only one node is left. This has a story associated with it. Flavius Josephus was Jewish Historian from 1st century. He and 40 other soldiers were trapped in a cave by Romans. They decided to kill themselves rather than surrendering to Romans. Their method was like this. All the soldiers will stand in a circle and every k th soldier will be shot dead. Josephus said to have calculated the starting point so that he would remain alive. So we have similar problem at hand. We delete every kth node in a circular list. Eventually only one node will be left. e.g. Let us say this is our list And we are deleting every third node.  We will delete 30. Then we delete 60. Next we delete 10. Next it will be 50. Next to be deleted is 20. Next 80. This continues. Implementation   We can count k-1 nodes and delete next node. This can be repeated in  a loop. What must be the termina...

Lowest common ancestor of binary search tree

Question : Write a function to print the lowest common ancestor of two nodes in a binary search tree.  Lowest common ancestor of two nodes x and y in a binary tree is the lowest node that has both x and y as descendants. Here lowest common ancestor of 1 and 7 is 3. LCA of 13 and 7 is root - 8. And LCA of 6 and 7 is 6 itself. The program to find gets complicated for an ordinary binary tree. But for a binary search tree, it is quite simple. As we see from the diagram above, the paths to 1 and 4 are common till the node 3. And at 3 they branch in different directions. So 3 is our LCA. That is lowest common ancestor is the node where the paths to x and y from root deviate. As long as they branch in same direction, we continue to traverse. When they branch in different directions, that is the lowest common ancestor. So let us write a simple algorithm, set temp=root if temp->val >x and temp->val>y temp = temp->left else if temp->val<x and ...