Skip to main content

Conversion of postfix expression to infix

How do we convert a postfix expression to infix expression?

A postfix expression or a "Reverse polish notation" is useful for programming. Because our programs can easily evaluate a postfix expression.

But for humans, postfix expressions are difficult to understand.

So is it possible to convert a given postfix expression to infix expression? Why not? It is possible with the help of stack data structure. 

Remember that when converting an expression from infix to postfix, we used operator stack. But in this case we need an operand stack.

What we need to do is - we extract values from expression. If there is an operand, we push it to stack. If there is an operator encountered, we pop two most recent values from stack, apply operator to them, enclose them in paranthesis and push the expression back to stack.

This procedure is continued until the entire expression is scanned. In the next step, the content of stack is popped out - which will be our infix expression.

So let me bullet these statements
  1. scan a character from postfix expression.
  2. if the character is an operand, push it to stack
  3. if the character scanned is an operator 
    1. pop expr1
    2. pop expr2
    3. form expr3 as (expr1 operator expr2)
  4. push expr3 to stack
  5. Repeat the steps 1 to 3, until all characters are scanned 
  6. pop content of stack as infix expression 
Let us look at an example postfix expression  53*4+

characterstackComments
5 5
35 3
*5  3 is popped
      5 is popped
     (5*3) is pushed
(5*3) 
4(5*3) 4
(5*3) - 4 is popped    
*   (5*3) is popped
  ((5*3)+4) is pushed
((5*3)+4)

Next the stack has ( (5*3)+4) which is popped. And that is our infix expression.

Let us write our C function for this now.


void convert(char *postfix,char *infix)
{
char ch;
char oper1,oper2,opernew;
char *expr1=(char*)malloc(30);
char *expr2=(char*)malloc(30);
char *expr3 = (char*)malloc(60);
struct node *top = NULL;
while(ch =*postfix++)
{
if(isdigit(ch))
{
char str[] = {ch,0};
top = push(str,top);
}
else if(is_operator(ch))
{
strcpy(expr1, pop(&top));
if(expr1==NULL)
{
printf("Error");
break;
}
strcpy(expr2 ,pop(&top));
if(expr2==NULL)
{
printf("Error");
break;
}
strcpy(expr3, concat(expr2,expr1,ch));
top = push(expr3,top);
}
}
strcpy(infix,pop(&top));
}


And here is the driver program. As you can see from the code, I have used linked list implementation of stack of strings here.


#include<stdio.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
struct node
{
char str[30];
struct node *next;
};
struct node *createnode(char *str)
{
struct node *newnode = (struct node*) malloc(sizeof(struct node));
strcpy(newnode->str,str);
newnode->next = NULL;
}

struct node * push(char *str,struct node *top)
{
struct node *newnode = createnode(str);
newnode->next = top;
top = newnode;
return top;
}

char * pop(struct node ** top)
{
static char str[30];
if(top==NULL)
return NULL;
struct node * temp = *top;
*top =(*top)->next;
strcpy(str,temp->str);

free(temp);
return str;
}

int is_operator(char ch)
{
switch(ch)
{
case '+':
case '-':
case '/':
case '*':
case '^':
return 1;
default : return 0;
}
}

char *concat(char *s1,char *s2,char ch)
{
char *result = (char*)malloc(60);
int i=1;
result[0] = '(';
while(*s1)
result[i++]=*s1++;
result[i++]=ch;
while(*s2)
result[i++]=*s2++;
result[i++]=')';//enclose in parantheses
result[i]=0;
return result;
}
void convert(char *postfix,char *infix)
{
char ch;
char oper1,oper2,opernew;
char *expr1=(char*)malloc(30);
char *expr2=(char*)malloc(30);
char *expr3 = (char*)malloc(60);
struct node *top = NULL;
while(ch =*postfix++)
{
if(isdigit(ch))
{
char str[] = {ch,0};
top = push(str,top);
}
else if(is_operator(ch))
{
strcpy(expr1, pop(&top));
if(expr1==NULL)
{
printf("Error");
break;
}
strcpy(expr2 ,pop(&top));
if(expr2==NULL)
{
printf("Error");
break;
}
strcpy(expr3, concat(expr2,expr1,ch));
top = push(expr3,top);
}
}
//strcpy(expr3 = pop(&top);
strcpy(infix,pop(&top));
}


int main()
{
char postfix[30];char infix[30];
double ans;
printf("Enter postfix expression :");
scanf("%s",postfix);
convert(postfix,infix);
printf("The expression in infix is %s",infix);
return 0;
}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delete a node from doubly linked list

Deletion operation in DLL is simpler when compared to SLL. Because we don't have to go in search of previous node of to-be-deleted node.  Here is how you delete a node Link previous node of node of to-be-deleted to next node. Link next node of node of to-be-deleted to previous node. Free the memory of node of to-be-deleted Simple, isn't it. The code can go like this. prevnode = delnode->prev; nextnode = delnode->next; prevnode->next = nextnode; nextnode->prev = prevnode; free(delnode); And that is it. The node delnode is deleted. But we should always consider boundary conditions. What happens if we are trying to delete the first node or last node? If first node is to be deleted, its previous node is NULL. Hence step 3 should not be used.  And also, once head is deleted, nextnode becomes head . Similarly if last node is to be deleted, nextnode is NULL. Hence step 4 is as strict NO NO. And we should set prevnode to tail. After we put these things together, we have...

Program to delete a node from linked list

How do you remove a node from a linked list? If you have to delete a node, first you need to search the node. Then you should find its previous node. Then you should link the previous node to the next node. If node containing 8 has to be deleted, then n1 should be pointing to n2. Looks quite simple. Isn't it? But there are at least two special cases you have to consider. Of course, when the node is not found. If the node is first node of the list viz head. If the node to be deleted is head node, then if you delete, the list would be lost. You should avoid that and make the second node as the head node. So it becomes mandatory that you return the changed head node from the function.   Now let us have a look at the code. #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> struct node { int data; struct node * next; }; typedef struct node * NODEPTR; NODEPTR create_node ( int value) { NODEPTR temp = (NODEPTR) malloc( size...

Binary tree deletion

Do not get all scared and worried. It is not rocket science (or as I would like to call it - it is not regex). Remember deleting a node from linked list. When you deleted a node, you did the following 2 steps Free the memory of the node Link the previous node of the deleted node to the next node You will have to do these things in binary tree too. But the difficulty here is do you link the previous node - or parent node in tree terminology, to the left child of deleted node? Or to the right child? You can not link both children, as the parent already may have one child node. So before we solve this, let us categorize the deletion with the help of a diagram. Consider the cases The node to be deleted is a leaf node. That is, it does not have left or right child. In this case, link the parent to NULL in place of deleted node.  If you want to delete 13 - which is a leaf node, you set 14->left to NULL and free memory of node 13. If you want to delete 7 - which is also a leaf node and...