Skip to main content

Search for a node in Linked List

Normally searching can be done using linear search or binary search. But in a linked list, jumping to an intermediate node is not possible. Hence searching should be done sequentially.

Let us assume we have a linked list of names.

struct node
{
   char name[30];
   struct node * next_ptr;
};
typedef struct node * NODEPTR;


In fact it would be better optimized, if we use a dynamic memory for name. For sake of simplicity, let us leave that. Now we have a node pointer called head, which points to the head of the list. And we also have a string search_string. We need to write a function to search this string, and return the pointer to node containing this string. If search string is not found, we must return NULL. 

NODEPTR head;
-----
-----
NODEPTR search(NODEPTR head, char *str)
{
      NODEPTR temp;
      for(temp=head;temp!=NULL;temp = temp->next_ptr)
      {
             if(strcmp(temp->name,str)==0)
                  return temp;
      }
      return NULL;
}
We start from first node and compare each node till we find the node containing str. But we should not forget to check for end of list, indicated by NULL.

One step where we may go wrong is comparing temp->name with str instead of using strcmp. If we compare them, then the pointers of these two strings are compared, which will never be equal.

Two more ways of optimization are

  1. Not using temp at all. Instead head itself can be used for list traversal. We need not worry that list would get corrupted. It won't as head is a call by value parameter. 
  2. In for condition adding the clause temp->NULL && strcmp(temp->name,str). If strcmp returns 0, condition is false and loop will terminate. But in this case, the body of for loop will be just a semicolon (;). And return statement will be return temp. If we have reached end of list, then temp will be NULL, so we return NULL. 
You can download the complete program from here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delete a node from doubly linked list

Deletion operation in DLL is simpler when compared to SLL. Because we don't have to go in search of previous node of to-be-deleted node.  Here is how you delete a node Link previous node of node of to-be-deleted to next node. Link next node of node of to-be-deleted to previous node. Free the memory of node of to-be-deleted Simple, isn't it. The code can go like this. prevnode = delnode->prev; nextnode = delnode->next; prevnode->next = nextnode; nextnode->prev = prevnode; free(delnode); And that is it. The node delnode is deleted. But we should always consider boundary conditions. What happens if we are trying to delete the first node or last node? If first node is to be deleted, its previous node is NULL. Hence step 3 should not be used.  And also, once head is deleted, nextnode becomes head . Similarly if last node is to be deleted, nextnode is NULL. Hence step 4 is as strict NO NO. And we should set prevnode to tail. After we put these things together, we have...
Post a Comment
Read more

Function to sort an array using bubble sort

Quick and dirty way of sorting an array is bubble sort. It is very easy to write and follow. But please keep in mind that it is not at all effecient. #include<iostream> using std::cin; using std::cout; void readArray(int arr[],int sz); void printArray(int arr[],int sz); void sortArray(int arr[],int sz); void swap(int &a,int &b); int main() {    int sz;    cout<<"Size of the array=";    cin>>sz;    int arr[sz];    readArray(arr,sz);     sortArray(arr,sz);   cout<<"Sorted array is ";   printArray(arr,sz); } void readArray(int arr[],int sz) {  for(int i=0;i<sz;i++)    {       cout<<"arr["<<i<<"]=";       cin>>arr[i];   } } void printArray(int arr[],int sz) {  for(int i=0;i<sz;i++)    {       cout<<"arr["<<i<<"]=";    ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Merge two binary search trees

How do you merge two binary search trees? I googled about the solutions. Most solutions told me to convert both trees into linked lists. Merge the lists. Then create a tree from the elements of the list. But why lists? Why can't we store the elements in an array? Because if the data of the tree is larger - not just integer keys, array manipulation becomes difficult. But again, we need not convert both the trees into lists. We can convert one tree into list - a doubly linked list. Then insert the elements of this list into the other tree. I tried this approach. To convert a tree into a sorted doubly linked list Create a doubly linked list. Let the prev and next links of nodes in this list be called left and right respectively. This way we can directly use the binary tree nodes in the list. Use a static variable previousnode  call the function recursively for left child of current node. link current node to the previousnode set next pointer of previousnode to curre...
Post a Comment
Read more