Skip to main content

Function to sort an array using bubble sort

Quick and dirty way of sorting an array is bubble sort. It is very easy to write and follow. But please keep in mind that it is not at all effecient.



#include<iostream>
using std::cin;
using std::cout;
void readArray(int arr[],int sz);
void printArray(int arr[],int sz);
void sortArray(int arr[],int sz);
void swap(int &a,int &b);

int main()
{
   int sz;
   cout<<"Size of the array=";
   cin>>sz;
   int arr[sz];
   readArray(arr,sz);
 
  sortArray(arr,sz);
  cout<<"Sorted array is ";
  printArray(arr,sz);
}

void readArray(int arr[],int sz)
{
 for(int i=0;i<sz;i++)
   {
      cout<<"arr["<<i<<"]=";
      cin>>arr[i];
  }
}


void printArray(int arr[],int sz)
{
 for(int i=0;i<sz;i++)
   {
      cout<<"arr["<<i<<"]=";
      cout<<arr[i]<<"\n";
  }
}
void sortArray(int arr[],int sz)
{
    for(int i=0;i<sz-1;i++)
   {
        for(int j=0;j<sz-i-1;j++)
        {
             if(arr[j]>arr[j+1])
                 swap(arr[j],arr[j+1]);
        }
   }
}
void swap(int &a,int &b)
{
    a = a+b;
    b = a-b;
    a = a-b;
}


This sorting compares and if necessary swaps the adjacent elements. Once all the elements are compared, it is one pass. Sorting requires such n-1 passes for an array of n elements. At each pass, the larger elements sink to the bottom and smaller elements bubble up to the top. Hence the name.
The complexity of bubble sort is O(n2)

You can make this slightly better by modifying the outer loop of sort function continue as long as there are any swappings.

void sortArray(int arr[],int sz)
{
    int swapped = 1;
    for(int i=0;i&lt && swapped==1;sz-1;i++)
   {
       swapped =0;//false
        for(int j=0;j<sz-i-1;j++)
        {
             if(arr[j]>arr[j+1])
                 {
                 swap(arr[j],arr[j+1]);
                  int swapped = 1;//set swapped to true
                  }
        }
   }
}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delete a node from doubly linked list

Deletion operation in DLL is simpler when compared to SLL. Because we don't have to go in search of previous node of to-be-deleted node.  Here is how you delete a node Link previous node of node of to-be-deleted to next node. Link next node of node of to-be-deleted to previous node. Free the memory of node of to-be-deleted Simple, isn't it. The code can go like this. prevnode = delnode->prev; nextnode = delnode->next; prevnode->next = nextnode; nextnode->prev = prevnode; free(delnode); And that is it. The node delnode is deleted. But we should always consider boundary conditions. What happens if we are trying to delete the first node or last node? If first node is to be deleted, its previous node is NULL. Hence step 3 should not be used.  And also, once head is deleted, nextnode becomes head . Similarly if last node is to be deleted, nextnode is NULL. Hence step 4 is as strict NO NO. And we should set prevnode to tail. After we put these things together, we have...

Merge two binary search trees

How do you merge two binary search trees? I googled about the solutions. Most solutions told me to convert both trees into linked lists. Merge the lists. Then create a tree from the elements of the list. But why lists? Why can't we store the elements in an array? Because if the data of the tree is larger - not just integer keys, array manipulation becomes difficult. But again, we need not convert both the trees into lists. We can convert one tree into list - a doubly linked list. Then insert the elements of this list into the other tree. I tried this approach. To convert a tree into a sorted doubly linked list Create a doubly linked list. Let the prev and next links of nodes in this list be called left and right respectively. This way we can directly use the binary tree nodes in the list. Use a static variable previousnode  call the function recursively for left child of current node. link current node to the previousnode set next pointer of previousnode to curre...