Skip to main content

Find middle node of a linked list

How do you find the middle node of singly linked list of unspecified length, by traversing the list only once?

Solution:
  • Take two pointers p1 and p2.               
  • Let p1 and p2 point to head
    • p1=p2 = head;
  • Advance p1 by one node at a time and p2  by 2 nodes at a time
  •                           
    • p1 = p1->next;                          
    • p2 = p2 ->next->next;
                 
  • When p2 reaches NULL, p1 will be in the middle node.
Here is the code for the same


NODEPTR find_mid_node(NODEPTR head)
{
NODEPTR t1 ,t2;
t1 = t2 = head;
while(t2!=NULL && t2->next!=NULL)
{
t1 = t1->next;
t2 = t2->next->next;
}
return t1;//this is the midnode
}



    How do you reverse a singly linked list?

    I have written a recursive solution for reversing a list in this post . Let us discuss non-recursive solution now. 
    • Take two pointers p1 and p2 pointing to first and second nodes        
      • p1 = head;
      • p2 = p1->next;
      • p1->next=NULL;  
    • Now reverse their links
      • p2->next = p1;
    • But now the problem is, we have lost track of the third and subsequent nodes. So before reversing the links store third node in p3
    •                           
      • p1 = head;
      • p2 = p1->next;
      • p3 = p2->next;
      • p2->next = p1;                   
                   
    • Now continue the process of reversing the links for next set of three nodes
      • p1 = p2;
      • p2 = p3;
      • p3 = p3->next;
    • Repeat this process until p3 reaches NULL. At this point of time, p2 will be the last node 
      • head = p2;


    And here is the code for reversing a singly linked list.


    NODEPTR reverse_list_nr(NODEPTR head)
    {
    NODEPTR p1,p2,p3;
    p1 = head;
    p2 = p1->next;
    p3 = p2->next;
    p1->next = NULL;
    while(p3!=NULL)
    {
    p2->next = p1;
    p1 = p2;
    p2 = p3;
    p3 = p3->next;
    }
    p2->next = p1;
    return p2;
    }

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Delete a node from doubly linked list

    Deletion operation in DLL is simpler when compared to SLL. Because we don't have to go in search of previous node of to-be-deleted node.  Here is how you delete a node Link previous node of node of to-be-deleted to next node. Link next node of node of to-be-deleted to previous node. Free the memory of node of to-be-deleted Simple, isn't it. The code can go like this. prevnode = delnode->prev; nextnode = delnode->next; prevnode->next = nextnode; nextnode->prev = prevnode; free(delnode); And that is it. The node delnode is deleted. But we should always consider boundary conditions. What happens if we are trying to delete the first node or last node? If first node is to be deleted, its previous node is NULL. Hence step 3 should not be used.  And also, once head is deleted, nextnode becomes head . Similarly if last node is to be deleted, nextnode is NULL. Hence step 4 is as strict NO NO. And we should set prevnode to tail. After we put these things together, we have...

    Function to sort an array using bubble sort

    Quick and dirty way of sorting an array is bubble sort. It is very easy to write and follow. But please keep in mind that it is not at all effecient. #include<iostream> using std::cin; using std::cout; void readArray(int arr[],int sz); void printArray(int arr[],int sz); void sortArray(int arr[],int sz); void swap(int &a,int &b); int main() {    int sz;    cout<<"Size of the array=";    cin>>sz;    int arr[sz];    readArray(arr,sz);     sortArray(arr,sz);   cout<<"Sorted array is ";   printArray(arr,sz); } void readArray(int arr[],int sz) {  for(int i=0;i<sz;i++)    {       cout<<"arr["<<i<<"]=";       cin>>arr[i];   } } void printArray(int arr[],int sz) {  for(int i=0;i<sz;i++)    {       cout<<"arr["<<i<<"]=";    ...

    Merge two binary search trees

    How do you merge two binary search trees? I googled about the solutions. Most solutions told me to convert both trees into linked lists. Merge the lists. Then create a tree from the elements of the list. But why lists? Why can't we store the elements in an array? Because if the data of the tree is larger - not just integer keys, array manipulation becomes difficult. But again, we need not convert both the trees into lists. We can convert one tree into list - a doubly linked list. Then insert the elements of this list into the other tree. I tried this approach. To convert a tree into a sorted doubly linked list Create a doubly linked list. Let the prev and next links of nodes in this list be called left and right respectively. This way we can directly use the binary tree nodes in the list. Use a static variable previousnode  call the function recursively for left child of current node. link current node to the previousnode set next pointer of previousnode to curre...